Profile image for TinaGarner

In The Telegraph online today there appears this email about the speed camera often placed on A27 Bridge Road: “You should investigate the legality of the mobile speed camera that is often positioned on the A27 at Sarisbury Hill, Hampshire. In my view it is quite apparent that convictions for speeding on this stretch of hill are not legal because two 30mph speed-limit signs are clearly obscured by foliage at either end of the trap zone. There are no repeat warnings, either. I have a court case pending for speeding on this road at 36mph.”
What do you think? Read Honest John's reply here:
http://tinyurl.com/2wen29c

  Report

By TinaGarner at 09:59 on 16/09/10

         Re-post           
 
  • Profile image for garywilmore

    Hampshire is one of the only counties to have a twenty percent speedo error allowance. If he was doing 36mph, the Police would have not convicted him. Therefore, this story is rubbish. If he was doing 37mph or above they would have had him. I recentley attended a speeding awareness course after being caught doing 38mph in a thirty. They informed me of this when I attended

    By garywilmore at 22:26 on 17/09/10

      Report
              
     
      

Join the Discussion

       
max 4000 characters
        
      

Local Jobs

       
   

Search for...

       
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min price is bigger than Max price
        
Min rent is bigger than Max rent